Al-Jazeera for dummies
by Posted Sat, Jan 1 2005
It is not easy working as a journalist for dubious Al-Jazeera, the Arabic language news channel funded by the royal family of Qatar, a tiny gas and oil-rich nation located in the shadow of Saudi Arabia.
Some leery U.S. government officials and those speaking for other Western national governments are skeptical of Al-Jazeera journalists, believing they serve as a front for anti-American terrorists, including Osama bin Laden. Others, such as the Saudi Arabian ruling class and viewers in additional Arab-speaking nations are suspicious of Al-Jazeera journalists and believe their editorial independence threatens the pan-Arabic goal of neutralizing Western-financed Israeli control in the Middle East.
Amidst all the stereotypes comes a mind-clearing book from Hugh Miles, an Arabic-speaking English journalist who grew up in the Middle East because of his diplomat father. Miles started paying close attention to Al-Jazeera two years ago, during the American invasion of Iraq. Living in London as an employee of Sky News, Miles received an assignment to monitor three Arab television stations every night from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. Because the Arab reporters had better entrée into Iraq than Sky News journalists, Miles was supposed to identify footage unique to Al-Jazeera, Al-Arabiya and Abu Dhabi TV. Once the footage was identified, Sky News could try to negotiate for it.
Although watching 12 consecutive hours of war video each day numbed Miles’ mind, he found himself fascinated with the professionalism of Al-Jazeera news programming. He realized he harbored more questions than answers: Who founded the channel? How was it financed? Did it have a compromising relationship with Osama bin Laden, like many American critics claimed? Was it a handmaiden to the anti-American resistance in Iraq, as rumored? What did Arab viewers think of the channel? Were the uncensored satellite broadcasts planting seeds for democracy throughout the Arab world, as Westerners seemed to believe free media could do?
Miles realized that finding the answers would be arduous: “Researching an Arab news network was not quite as straightforward as researching a Western one. . . . Arab society is opaque and statistics and demography are not part of ordinary life.”
So Miles flew to Qatar and asked permission from Al-Jazeera management to interview the station’s journalists so he could visit its bureaus around the world. The answer: yes. “Since Al-Jazeera had nothing to hide, they said, it was in their interest to let an independent observer have a snoop around, especially since the network was planning the launch of an English-language channel,” Miles reports. Miles spent many days in Doha, the Qatari capital, and visited Al-Jazeera bureaus in Amman, Cairo, Jerusalem, Ramallah, London, Paris, New York City, Washington D.C. and Detroit, whose suburb, Dearborn, is home to the largest Arabic-speaking population concentration in the United States. In addition, Miles interviewed competing journalists, officials from numerous governments, media scholars, and viewers of Al-Jazeera.
For journalists who are unable to evaluate Al-Jazeera for themselves, Miles’ findings are enlightening. Although his generalizations are filled with nuanced exceptions, for the most part Miles concludes that Al-Jazeera runs a first-rate news operation, no more biased than, for instance, U.S.-based Fox News. Miles is certain that Al-Jazeera is not a tool of Osama bin Laden or any other militant spouting anti-American rhetoric.
Until Sept. 11, 2001, Western government and news media officials generally ignored Al-Jazeera or denigrated it as biased. But as worldwide sympathy for American victims of 9/11 dissipated in the wake of heartless bombing runs across Afghanistan, the Bush administration decided it needed to win Arab hearts and minds. So its spokespersons showed up on Al-Jazeera, all but one (former ambassador Christopher Ross) talking in English that had to be translated into Arabic. Their insincerity could not be masked by their words, in any language.
When not relating Al-Jazeera’s complicated evolution over the past decade or the wrongheaded stereotypes held by its blinded-by-prejudice critics, Miles provides fascinating vignettes of how the network’s journalists ferret out the news despite seemingly insurmountable obstacles. One of the most fascinating of these examples is the investigative reporting of Yosri Fouda, an Egyptian on the network’s multinational staff. Before joining Al-Jazeera, Fouda taught communications at the American University of Cairo, worked on a doctorate at Glasgow University, and trained at the British Broadcasting Corporation and the Associated Press.
“Since starting at Al-Jazeera, this Egyptian sleuth has almost single-handedly pioneered the Arab tradition of investigative journalism,” Miles says. “His investigations have taken him to some of the most God-forsaken parts of the planet, where he has met some of the most maniacal terrorists, and he has been arrested many times, but, so far at least, has always managed to come back unscathed.” At several places in the book, Miles details some of those investigations.
Miles gives Fouda the last word in the book. Miles notes, “The information age is upon us and in the decades ahead we can expect only more Al-Jazeeras, adding to an ever greater torrent of information, as regional ideas spread around the world and become global. Things will never be how they were before.” Then he turns the page over to Fouda.
“Freedom is like death,” Fouda says. “You cannot visit death and then come back from it.”